thoughts after Copenhagen

By cyn on December 22, 2009

Tags: ,

Thoughts after Copenhagen -
I didn’t believe in the ‘invisible hand of the market’, but after Copenhagen I am beginning to wonder! People across the world told their governments they wanted action on climate change, yet when the leaders of governments met together the voice of the people that was not heard – was it rather the interests of corporate profit, speaking through the leaders? But why should corporate profit override the interests of people and our earth? How can this happen?

By their legal constitution corporations are told to put the profits of shareholders first, but this situation was created through law made by parliament. So when the people want action on climate change why cannot the government change the law? Why couldn’t a government empower the corporations to act in the interests of people as workers and citizens and of the environment we depend on before the profits for the richest few?

Something about rights and responsibilities comes to mind here. Corporations have been given a lot of rights and take little or no responsibility at the moment.

However, listening to radio 4 today and M&S spokesperson talking about the action they are taking, I wonder whether they are beginning to listen to the people? – if citizens keep up the pressure perhaps eventually government will catch up!

Previous and next posts

2 Comments

  1. Tony Weekes
    Posted December 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    You’re right, Cyn: “If citizens keep up the pressure perhaps eventually government will catch up.” But I find myself in some despair about the sheer level of ignorance (I use the term descriptively, not pejoratively). Periodicals like the Ethical Consumer are still not as well known (and used!) as they should be. The level of political debate, as we approach the 2010 general election, is appallingly bad. Did those who struggled for universal suffrage struggle in vain?
    One hope lies with us (as Quakers)? But I am still not sure we have grasped the implications of Boulding’s Backhouse lecture (see the brief quote in my blog contribution – now some weeks ago!)
    WAKE UP, FRIENDS!!!!


  2. david dunn
    Posted January 8, 2010 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    You hit the nail on the head, but we need to tax carbon at source to replace all other taxes to make any real change in the mindset of people .

    Money talks !!!!!!!!


Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*